INTEGRAL LOGIC OF ORGANIZATION OF THE LIVING. appears in file: VL_Kalmykov_ILOL.asc THEORETICAL GLOBAL ECOLOGY V.L.Kalmykov and A.S.Kharitonov Institute of Cell Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow Region, 142292, Russia AUTHOR GOALS AND CONCRETE POSITION IN THE MATTER. In our opinion, there are two kinds of ecologists. The first ones are aimed at direct practical ecological works. The second ones are dealing with "planting" environmental ideas into heads and hearts of ecological students. Without denying the significance of the first kind, our subject is the second aspect. We believe the main problem of environmental education to be the absence of integral ecological ideology (theoretical global ecology), that is the poor ecological language. The ecological language means an integral system of scientific definitions of such notions as life, information, living organisms, including biocoenoses and biosphere on the whole, as well as direction of the living evolution etc. We realize the complexity of the problem and so we are looking for like-minded persons for collaboration. Our position is presented in the paper enclosed. We hope this paper would be the "brick" in our common building of environmental ideology. One of ours goals is organization of the Internet (WWW) Seminar "THEORETICAL GLOBAL ECOLOGY". Purpose and objectives of the Seminar: - practical - making the methodological tools for ecological planning, forcast and optimize life - the top ecological language as a strict, scientifically interpretable theory - and, thereby, good for practice); - educational - "planting" environmental ideas into heads and hearts of ecological students as the generalized integral ecological language (as a result of participation in the Internet Seminar); - organizational - creation of a collaboration team of scientists/educators (as the Internet Seminar); - scientific - making some steps to consensus on the high top ecological ideology (discussion of the concepts and the possible agreement on the notions). The relevant experience of Dr. V.Kalmykov: a) 1980-1989: Scientific Secretary of the Methodological Seminar at Institute of Biological Physics, Pushchino. b) 1979-1982, 1984-1987: Head of the Seminar on Theoretical Biology at the Biological Research Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow Region. Direction: the construction of alive in notions, principles and schemes. c) 1982-1984: Coordinator of the Methodological Club "Polis". Direction: search for ways of development of Pushchino Research Center. To our mind, the theoretical global ecology and the general theory of the living are identical. That is why our work is aimed at formulating the general logic of the functional organization of living systems. We presents such a generalized theoretical description of the living. The generalized definitions of the following notions are given: organism, organization level, criteria of evolutionary direction, information, complete entropy, creation, life ... . Vyacheslav Kalmykov and Alexander Kharitonov Dr. V.Kalmykov, Ph.D. Institute of Cell Biophysics Russian Academy of Sciences Pushchino, Moscow Region, 142292, Russia E-mail (Internet): Kalmykov@venus.ibioc.serpukhov.su This paper shows some attempt to invent and formulate the general logic of the functional organization of living systems. It is also aimed, according to John Maddox, at elucidating, to some extent "the dark side of molecular biology" [1]. The modern molecular biology mainly deals with particular details of the molecular structure of the living. This very often damages traditional biological problems. The task is close to the questions of what life is and why it is organized so. Being traditional for the theoretical biology, these questions are at present especially urgent in connection with the problems of ecological education. This work presents such a generalized theoretical description of the living. It includes elements of axiomatic approach and is physically interpretable. A mathematical group of elementary operations, which are not reduced to each other, is suggested as a fundamental notion for the living world. The mathematical group is the functional invariant of the living organization. The regulations for mechanisms of integrational closure of elementary operations onto each other in the course of biological self-organization are examined as well. The generalized definitions of the following notions are given: organism, organization level, information, entropy, evolutionary direction, life. The suggested functional invariant of organization appears to be fundamental not only for biological objects themselves but also for any organizational levels of the living. The first variant of the results obtained in this direction was published earlier [2a, 2b]. Here are the main statements, notions and interpretations: 1. The set of compatible systems (M) is the basis of the living. These systems are formed by fixation of free environmental energy in their structure and, as a result, they are able to do some work. Such systems will further be called ENDERGONIC ones. Compatibility of these systems is structural homomorphism in character, i.e. they have a fundamental unity of specific morphological arrangement. In consequence, there is some easiness of their interaction up to the possibility of a reciprocal transformation. 2. The environment, as an initial source and a final drainage receiver of substance and/or energy, is necessary for existence of the living. The environment is assumed to afford some interval of conditions for realization of optimal kinetic stability of structures of the living. 3. Endergonic systems of the set M possess such a vast structural variety (polymorphism), that they are capable of establishing ten pairs of simple mutually opposite functional relations between each other, i.e. between their constituents and the environment (set R) (SEE Table 1). This set of functions is basically invariant for the living. The notion "function" used here is analogous to its use in the work by G.A.Chauvet [3]. Stressing the orientation and asymmetry of the notion "function", the word "operation" is used in this work as a synonym. Table 1. Set R includes ten pairs of mutually opposite simple operations that underlie the living. [-------------------------------------------------------------------] Direct operations Reverse operations [-------------------------------------------------------------------] 1. Identification 1'. Identification 2. Right-hand mirror reflection 2'. Left-hand mirror reflection 3. Change of the relative 3'. Conservation of the relative position of the operation position in space (fixation object in space or return of the position) 4. Transformation of 4'. Conservation of configuration configuration (resistance to transformation; reconstruction of configuration) 5. Increase (growth, 5'. Decrease (reduction, addition ...) subtraction, elimination) 6. Entrance 6'. Going out 7. Connection (maintenance 7'. Disconnection or increase of interaction (including isolation) probability, binding, adhesion, compilation of two or more operation objects) 8. Switch-on, i.e. mediating 8'. Switch-off initiation of a specific action of the operation object, affected by a definite way 9. Source 9'. Drainage receiver 10. Concentration 10'. Scattering [----------------------------------------------------------------------] The operations of set R and their combinations entirely cover all kinds of relations that are obligatory for emergence and a stable existence of endergonic systems of the set M. The operations are equally performed with substance and energy and information. Operations R constitute the MATHEMATICAL GROUP G over all possible combinations. The proofs are: 1. In case of combinations (unlike arrangements) the sequence of operations is not significant, hence the performance of properties of associativity appears. 2. All combinations of operations belong to one group. This follows from the conditions of specifying this set, in combinations of which all possible changes in the system are embedded. 3. There is the only common unit, which is the operation of identification. 4. There is a reverse element for each element (SEE Table 1). Self-organization is a spontaneous emergence of the structures of order in the course of spontaneous processes. The structures of order of endergonic systems are in principle thermodynamically instable kinetic stabilities. During self-organization the spontaneous transitions from one structure of order to another are conditioned by thermodynamic instability (nonequilibrium). The possible types of the structures of order of endergonic systems are as follows: 1. The static ones. For instance, organic molecules (including macromolecules) and their crystals. 2. The informationally unmediated stationary structures. They are dynamic structures existing due to an informationally unmediated return to the initial position (state, form). For example, dissipative autocatalitic structures of the Beloussov - Zhabotinsky reaction type [4], whirlwinds, rivers (permanent stations based on the water circulation)... 3. The informationally mediated stationary structures. They are dynamic structures existing due to an informationally mediated return to the initial position (state, form). The kinds of such automorphic processes are: reproduction, adaptive behaviour, recovery (regeneration, repair). As it is seen from the points listed, any endergonic structure of order can be characterized by its specific group of symmetry. In particular, this appears from the fact that the set of transformations, which make the system return to its initial position (state, form), is just one of the definitions of a group of symmetry. Group G characterized here is common to all the possible endergonic structures. Let us consider two neighbouring levels of the system organization: the system itself and its subsystems of the first below-lying level. When examining the system (a complex of interacting subsystems) as a single whole (as if "from outside"), we are speaking about the macroapproach. Here the inner subsystems (microlevel) are ignored, and generalized characteristics of the state are only relevant. The generalized characteristics, like free energy, symmetry and entropy, allow us to speak about the system transformations (transitional structures of order). In case of the microapproach the system is supposed to be examined from inside, and behavioral characteristics of the subsystems (microsystems) are relevant. In the macroapproach the notion "space of possible (virtual) transitional states of structures of order" is used. In the microapproach we use the notion "space of possible behavioral forms of the subsystem (microsystem) of the first below-lying level of system organization". There are certain CRITERIA OF THE DIRECTION of spontaneous autonomous transformations of macrosystems, i.e. a spontaneous behavior of microsystems within an isolated macrosystem is only "permitted" when: - free energy of the macrosystem (its capability of doing some work) decreases; - entropy of the macrosystem increases; - symmetry of the macrosystem increases. Criteria 1 and 2 formulate the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Criterion 3 is a corollary of the general principle of symmetry of physical phenomena formulated by Pierre Curie [5] in 1894. This principle is also developed in the work by V.A. Kopcik [6]. Free energy of the system is defined as the ability to do some work autonomously. SYMMETRY of the system is characterized by an at most high group of transformations, which leave the system unchanged. As for entropy, the matter is more difficult. In this work COMPLETE ENTROPY of the isolated system is defined as a volume of the space of possible transitional structures of order on their way to equilibrium. This definition is close to that of absolute entropy by Max Plank [7,8], which does not require any probabilistic ideas and is applicable to physical systems with any number of freedom degrees. The author believe that the conception about SPACE OF POSSIBLE TRANSITIONAL STRUCTURES OF ORDER could be defined as a space of possible transitional groups of the system symmetry. Hence it appears that COMPLETE ENTROPY of the system is an extensive characteristic of its POTENTIAL (EVOLUTIONARY ACHIEVABLE) SYMMETRY, which seems to be rather paradoxical. To think that the system is entirely isolated is just idealization. When extreme principles are applied to a real system, recourse to its mental isolation must be had. In fact, the system remains open. The mental isolation of the system is emphasized by means of the notion "independence" of its transformations (behavior). It is most correct to use the formulated extreme principles locally, as a criterion for choosing the direction of spontaneous processes at each concrete point of evolution, but not "on the whole". Origin and evolution of the living is self-organization of structures of order. The complexes of endergonic systems of set M act in the capacity of these structures and carry the combinations of operations of set R. Spontaneous formation of these complexes occur in such a way that the combinations, satisfying the formulated extreme principles, are realized. New self-organized structures of order are formed on the basis of the kinetic stabilities achieved earlier. So, each step within self- organization means an increase of specific contribution of new-emerging structures to realization of the formulated extreme principles, in particular the SPECIFIC POWER and/or SPECIFIC SYMMETRY of the system continuously increase (the mass of the systems lies in the divizors of these specific values). INFORMATION is the central factor determining the stability and the functional efficiency of informationally mediated stationary structures, the living organisms belong to. Hence, the main link in the evolutionary process of the living is functional perfection for obtaining, accumulating, processing and using INFORMATION. Let us consider the STAGES OF EMERGENCE OF LIVING ORGANISMS on the basis of the set of endergonic systems M. The following steps of self- organization of endergonic systems leading to origin and evolution of the living can be discerned: 1) emergence of elementary cycles of catalysis; 2) emergence of cycles of autocatalysis consisting of elementary cycles; 3) emergence of hypercycles [9] consisting of cycles of autocatalysers; 4) formation of functional interclosures (organisms) over the operations of set R of hypercyclic, autocatalytic, catalytic and simple noncatalytic structures. Two operations of the functional interclosures finally remain open for the environment: sources and drains. FUNCTIONAL INTERCLOSURES (ORGANISMS), formed by this process fill up the set of self-organized endergonic systems M. They belong to a higher level of organization. The new level of organization is initial for recurrence of the described self-organized logic etc. THE LEVEL OF ORGANIZATION is a stage in evolution of systems, on which the functional interclosure of their subsystems goes with a principle unity of their specific morphological conformation (with their structural homomorphism). THE FUNCTIONAL INTERCLOSURE of organism subsystems makes sense that when interacting with each other, with the environment and other organisms, they provide a kinetically stable existence and development of the organism and, thereby, the existence and development of each other. It should be noted that such a functional interclosure is realized in the limit of all organisms and factors of the environment and inner medium, i.e. within the life process as a whole (BIOSPHERE). A living ORGANISM is therefore both a functional interclosure and a partial functional closer of the life process factors to a single whole. An automatic forced selection of alternative combinations of the elements under consideration goes in the direction satisfying the formulated extreme principles. Information mediating the selection of these behavioral forms appears at the points where alternative behavioral forms (combinations of dissipation flows) are equally probable or realization of hardly probable behavioral forms is necessary from the standpoint of satisfaction of extreme principles. Realization of the selection of the given behavioral form by the system occurs with the help of controlling subsystems making selective steps in potential kinetic barriers, which keep back the dissipation of free energy of the system and/or selectively lower such potential barriers in accordance with the available information. The mediating function of information becomes a participator of principle in mutual coordination of self-organized endergonic systems beginning with the stage of emergence of hypercycles. INFORMATION is reflection of a definite trajectory of behavior of the system in the space of its possible behavioral forms that allows the system an identical reproduction of the selection made by the system earlier in its behavior. It can be also said that INFORMATION is an interrelation of events fixed in any way. In the last sense INFORMATION and REFLECTION OF THE FUNCTION is one and the same. Information is the central link in the mechanisms of coordination of operations of set R within subsystems of organisms, communities of organisms and the whole biosphere. Functionally, information manifests itself in three different forms, being part of three integrating functions: CONTROL, REPRODUCTION AND CREATION. The three functions integrate elementary operations of set R to a single whole within functional interclosures. CONTROL is a directed change in the probability of realising alternative trajectories of the controlled object behavior. REPRODUCTION is a cycle of the system transformations under control, which results in emergence of its copy. CREATION is a combinatorial process aimed at forming a new type of information mediating the system behavior CONTROL and/or REPRODUCTION in higher ( in accordance to the extremal principles) evolutionary level. The obtained information, in particular, realizes the process of polymorphic reproduction of the system (i.e. REPRODUCTION of a new type of the system placement by introducing and/or removing its elements and/or by changing its structure). REPRODUCTION is the hypercycle of the control cycles and CREATION is the hypercycle of reproduction cycles. INFORMATION, arisen in creation cycle is the base for reproduction of controlling structures. Life is a spontaneous process of combinatorial generation of the group G of functional interclosures (organisms, organizations) by combining the operations of set R above the set of endergonic systems M. REFERENCES 1. Maddox,J. Nature 363, 13 (1993). 2a. Kalmykov,V.L. "The significance of the Theoretical Biology for Biotechnology" (preprint in Russian), Pushchino, 1988, 11 pages. 2b. Kalmykov V.L. (1995) "The Functional Scheme of Organization and Evolution of the Living ", SMBnet archives in directory smb/pubs as two files: and . 3. Chauvet,G.A. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 339, 425-444 (1993). 4. Jantch,E. Autopoiesis. A Theory of Living Organization (ed. Zeleny,M.) 65-88 (North Holland, N.Y., 1981). 5. Curie,P. Journ. de Phys. (III),3,393 (1894). 6. Koptsik,V.A. J. Physics vol. C, 16 (1983). 7. Planck,M. Z. Phys. 35, 49-57 (1925). 8. Planck,M. Sitzungsber. Acad. Wiss. Berlin, 442-451 (1925). 9. Eigen,M. & Schuster,P. The Hypercycle. A Principle of Natural Self- Organization (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979).